<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women in high office spell disaster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amos2008.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/women-in-high-office-spell-disaster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amos2008.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/women-in-high-office-spell-disaster/</link>
	<description>Help to restore Truth and Justice in society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:59:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://amos2008.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/women-in-high-office-spell-disaster/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amos2008.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Why only mention Harriet Harman? What about Hazel Blears and Jacqui Smith? Now there&#039;s a trio of walking disasters if ever there was one!
Nor should any hopes be held out for David Cameron. Reports claim he is as &quot;mangina-ified&quot; as they come.
Alas poor Britain!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why only mention Harriet Harman? What about Hazel Blears and Jacqui Smith? Now there&#8217;s a trio of walking disasters if ever there was one!<br />
Nor should any hopes be held out for David Cameron. Reports claim he is as &#8220;mangina-ified&#8221; as they come.<br />
Alas poor Britain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lenfirewood</title>
		<link>http://amos2008.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/women-in-high-office-spell-disaster/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>lenfirewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amos2008.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-149</guid>
		<description>You are right to point out the negative consequences of all women shortlists - such measures are expressions of bigotry dressed up as &#039;social justice&#039; and nothing more. 
That said I think you should acknowledge that women CAN be as competent as men in high office when they get there on merit alone. Not to acknowledge this fact only sets you up as a mirror image of the very bigotry you are trying to counter in my opinion and that would be a shame because then the merit in your message gets lost also .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right to point out the negative consequences of all women shortlists &#8211; such measures are expressions of bigotry dressed up as &#8217;social justice&#8217; and nothing more.<br />
That said I think you should acknowledge that women CAN be as competent as men in high office when they get there on merit alone. Not to acknowledge this fact only sets you up as a mirror image of the very bigotry you are trying to counter in my opinion and that would be a shame because then the merit in your message gets lost also .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
