<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeremy Paxman tells the truth about the BBC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amos2008.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/jeremy-paxman-tells-the-truth-about-the-bbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amos2008.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/jeremy-paxman-tells-the-truth-about-the-bbc/</link>
	<description>Help to restore Truth and Justice in society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:59:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Georghe Rolph</title>
		<link>http://amos2008.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/jeremy-paxman-tells-the-truth-about-the-bbc/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Georghe Rolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amos2008.wordpress.com/?p=68#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Of course Paxman is right but the girly boys and feminists out there dare not admit it. If they did, all their ideological programming would tumble about their ears. 

That is the problem with ideology. Despite the flaws in its supporting pillars you have to hold the roof of it up by defending the pillars, no matter how rotten they may be. The only way to do that is to deny the evidence of your own senses. Then you become an idiot. Possibly a dangerous idiot but still, an idiot. 

For the feminists that riddle the BBC to admit they discriminate would mean that they would be huge hypocrites and that women were NOT the only victims of discrimination. In turn, that would mean that the matriarchy is as flawed as the patriarchy. Once that is admitted their whole reason for existing and the ideology itself comes apart. Therefore, they lie, they squeal, they scream and they bully and we are not supposed to see through it. 

If feminism were not so dangerous and divisive it would be funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Paxman is right but the girly boys and feminists out there dare not admit it. If they did, all their ideological programming would tumble about their ears. </p>
<p>That is the problem with ideology. Despite the flaws in its supporting pillars you have to hold the roof of it up by defending the pillars, no matter how rotten they may be. The only way to do that is to deny the evidence of your own senses. Then you become an idiot. Possibly a dangerous idiot but still, an idiot. </p>
<p>For the feminists that riddle the BBC to admit they discriminate would mean that they would be huge hypocrites and that women were NOT the only victims of discrimination. In turn, that would mean that the matriarchy is as flawed as the patriarchy. Once that is admitted their whole reason for existing and the ideology itself comes apart. Therefore, they lie, they squeal, they scream and they bully and we are not supposed to see through it. </p>
<p>If feminism were not so dangerous and divisive it would be funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://amos2008.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/jeremy-paxman-tells-the-truth-about-the-bbc/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 01:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amos2008.wordpress.com/?p=68#comment-140</guid>
		<description>A well-written article. It&#039;s one of the reasons I left the UK - it&#039;s quite depressing being a man over there. The web news is obsessed with misandry, too. Press-released stories - one on the BBC News site tuther day - stated something about women being &quot;sexually more emotionally mature&quot;, or something. I didn&#039;t look at the article, and now, after a tirade of such shite, I won&#039;t bother looking at the BBC News web at all. I&#039;m just so happy that I left the UK, and so stopped paying my licence fee. The only thing I ever, ever watched, anyway, was &quot;Working Lunch&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A well-written article. It&#8217;s one of the reasons I left the UK &#8211; it&#8217;s quite depressing being a man over there. The web news is obsessed with misandry, too. Press-released stories &#8211; one on the BBC News site tuther day &#8211; stated something about women being &#8220;sexually more emotionally mature&#8221;, or something. I didn&#8217;t look at the article, and now, after a tirade of such shite, I won&#8217;t bother looking at the BBC News web at all. I&#8217;m just so happy that I left the UK, and so stopped paying my licence fee. The only thing I ever, ever watched, anyway, was &#8220;Working Lunch&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
